Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 172

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : December | Volume : 17 | Issue : 12 | Page : WC01 - WC05 Full Version

Clinicoepidemiological Profile of Patients with Chronic Urticaria and its Association with D-dimer Levels at a Tertiary Care Centre: A Prospective Cohort Study


Published: December 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/66909.18780
DilipChandra Chintada, KiranKanth Vudayana, Jahnavi Chaduvula, Pallavi Gullipalli, Khatija Begum Mohammed

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Dermatology, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 3. Postgraduate Student, Department of Dermatology, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 4. Postgraduate Student, Department of Dermatology, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 5. Postgraduate Student, Department of Dermatology, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dilipchandra Chintada,
ASN Colony, Behind Tupakula Building, Srikakulam-532001, Andhra Pradesh, India.
E-mail: dilipchandragems18@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic urticaria is a commonly encountered, long-standing skin condition that typically lasts for more than six weeks and has various underlying aetiologies, including chronic infections, infestations, immunological and non immunological causes, and physical factors. In some cases, it may be idiopathic. Recent studies have shown that the activation of the coagulation cascade is involved in the development of chronic urticaria. This involvement is reflected in plasma D-dimer levels, which are explored in the current study.

Aim: To assess the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of urticaria and their association with D-dimer levels in a tertiary care centre.

Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted at Department of Dermatology, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India, from August 2022 to July 2023. The study included 100 chronic urticaria patients attending the dermatology Outpatient Department (OPD) to investigate various clinical types and their epidemiological factors. D-dimer levels were estimated using the latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetry assay method. The mean and range were calculated, and statistical analysis of various clinic-epidemiological characteristics was performed using Pearson’s Chi-square test. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Among the 100 patients with chronic urticaria, 40 (40%) were males and 60 (60%) were females. The mean age of presentation was 30 years, and the mean duration was 20.5 months. Elevated plasma D-dimer levels were noted in 40 (40%) of the study population. Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) constituted 92 (92%) of the cases, followed by Chronic Inducible Urticaria (CIU) with 4 (4%) cases and 4 (4%) cases with CSU+CIU. Angioedema was noted in 20 (20%) of the cases in the present study. Thyroid disorder was seen in 12 (12%) of the study population. The majority of patients (44%) had mild urticaria. The mean Urticaria Activity Score (UAS) score before treatment was 21.08. A statistically significant association was found between elevated plasma D-dimer levels and age range, duration of chronic urticaria, disease severity, angioedema, and response to antihistamines. The response to antihistamines was graded based on the UAS7 score calculated before and after treatment.

Conclusion: The present study provides additional evidence to the existing literature by establishing an association between D-dimer levels and factors such as severity and angioedema. It also provides important insights into the relationship between age range, duration of chronic urticaria, and elevated plasma D-dimer levels by establishing statistical significance between these factors.

Keywords

Angioedema, Chronic inducible urticaria, Chronic spontaneous urticaria, Coagulation cascade, Histamine antagonists

Urticaria and angioedema belong to a heterogeneous group of diseases that can occur due to a multitude of causes. Urticaria may be caused by various factors such as antigen-antibody complexes, direct mast cell activation, and activation of the FcεR1 receptor, which are some of the pathogenic bases of urticaria. In most cases of acute urticaria, Immunoglobulin E (IgE) plays an important role, while Immunoglobulin G (IgG) is implicated in cases of chronic urticaria. Due to these multiple pathogenic bases, the management of this condition is challenging as the cause cannot always be ascertained (1).

Activation of the complement occurs due to various stimuli, and the release of the C5a fragment stimulates mast cells and acts chemotactically on neutrophils, eosinophils, and monocytes. Mast cells release both preformed mediators (e.g., histamine, heparin, bradykinin) and mediators produced immediately after activation (e.g., prostaglandins), (2), which ultimately cause vasodilation and a wheal and flare reaction.

Chronic urticaria is defined as the occurrence of wheals with or without angioedema for six weeks or longer (3),(4). There has been exploration of the interaction between immunological and coagulation pathways in recent years as a probable cause of chronic and treatment-resistant cases of urticaria (1). It has been observed that tissue factor expressed by eosinophils can induce activation of the coagulation cascade, which in turn generates thrombin that can increase vascular permeability both directly by acting on endothelial cells and indirectly by inducing degranulation of mast cells (3).

D-dimer is a fibrin degradation product and a marker of thrombin activity, which increases vascular permeability and stimulates mast cell degranulation (5). The present study has been conducted based on the assumption that a positive association exists between various clinicoepidemiological disease activities of chronic urticaria and elevated D-dimer levels.

Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the role of D-dimer in chronic urticaria in the past, showing a significant association. Positive associations between severity and elevated D-dimer levels have been observed in these studies (1),(2). The results of a study by Sadowska-Przytocka et al., showed a statistically significant high positive association between serum D-dimer concentration and the severity of urticaria symptoms (1). Another study conducted by Criado PR et al., revealed that patients with active chronic urticaria had the highest serum levels of D-dimer compared to those with chronic urticaria in remission (2).

The pathogenesis of chronic urticaria is idiopathic in many cases. There is a gap in the literature regarding the exact pathogenesis in these cases. Along with autoimmunity, the role of the coagulation system can be a causative factor (1). The possibility of activation of the coagulation system was explored by using the D-dimer assay in the present study. The exact role of this immunological and coagulation interaction should be further determined. Hence, the aim of the present study was to assess the clinicoepidemiological characteristics of chronic urticaria and their association with D-dimer levels.

Material and Methods

The present prospective cohort study was conducted at Department of Dermatology, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India, for a duration of one year from August 2022 to July 2023. The study included 100 patients with chronic urticaria who attended the dermatology OPD during the study period. Institutional Ethical Committee clearance (07/IEC/GEMS&H/2023) was obtained, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged >18 years with a diagnosis of chronic urticaria (urticaria lasting >6 weeks) were included in the present study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with a history of thromboembolic diseases, cardiovascular accidents, coronary artery disease, liver disease, severe renal disease, deep vein thrombosis, recent surgeries, malignancy, recent trauma, those on anticoagulants, autoimmune connective tissue diseases, or vasculitis were excluded from the study. Pregnant and lactating females were also excluded.

Clinicoepidemiological characteristics that were assessed included age, gender, duration of chronic urticaria, severity of disease, and antihistamine resistance with elevated D-dimer levels.

Study Procedure

A detailed history was taken, and a complete cutaneous and systemic examination was performed. Urticaria Activity Score 7 (UAS7) was calculated for each patient before and after treatment with antihistamines. All routine investigations were conducted, including complete blood count, absolute eosinophil count, liver function tests, kidney function tests, and thyroid hormone levels. Bleeding time and clotting time were also noted. The evaluation of D-dimer levels [5,6] involved estimating D-dimer levels in the patients using the latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetry assay method. The cut-off value for normal D-dimer was 500 μg/mL [5,6].

To perform the test, a 3.6 mL blood sample was mixed with 0.4 mL sodium citrate in 10 mL tubes under sterile conditions. These samples were immediately sent to the laboratory within three hours. Centrifugation was then conducted at 1600 G for 10 minutes at 22ºC to obtain platelet-poor plasma. Following this, a double spin was performed through centrifugation at 1500 G for six minutes at 9ºC. D-Dimer concentration levels were quantified in the obtained serum sample using the latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay method.

The cases were classified into CSU, CIU, and a combination of both CSU and CIU based on the patients’ history and relevant investigations. The severity of urticaria was graded using the UAS7 score. The UAS7 score is the sum of scores obtained by assigning numerical values to the severity of wheals and pruritus for each day in a week. The score ranges from 0-42 (Table/Fig 1) (7): UAS7 values were assigned to five score ranges (bands). A score between 1-6 is considered as well-controlled urticaria. Scores ranging from 7-15, 16-27, and 27-42 are considered as mild, moderate, and severe urticaria, respectively. Post-treatment, the response was graded based on the reduction in UAS score. Patients with a UAS7 score between 0-6 were considered to show an adequate response. Patients with a UAS score between 7-42 were considered to show an inadequate response, reflecting urticaria disease activity (Table/Fig 2) (8).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 29.0. Pearson’s Chi-square test was applied to determine the statistical significance between D-dimer levels and clinicoepidemiological factors. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

In the present study population, CSU was the most common type of chronic urticaria, accounting for 92% of cases (Table/Fig 4). The number of males (n=20) and females (n=20) with elevated plasma D-dimer levels was equal, but the proportion of male patients (50%) with elevated D-dimer levels was higher than that of females (33.33%). However, there was no statistically significant association between gender and plasma D-dimer levels (p-value=0.96) (Table/Fig 5).

The age range of the study group was 18-75 years, with a mean age of 30 years. A statistically significant association (p-value=0.03) was noted between age and D-dimer levels in patients with chronic urticaria (Table/Fig 6).

The mean duration of urticaria was 20.5 months, and the majority of patients (44%) presented with a duration of less than three months. There was a remarkably significant statistical association (p-value=0.0002) between duration and elevated plasma D-dimer levels (Table/Fig 7).

Urticaria severity was graded as mild, moderate, or severe based on the UAS score. The majority of patients (44%) presented with mild urticaria. A large percentage of patients with severe urticaria (71%) had elevated D-dimer levels, compared to only 9% in mild cases. There was a strong statistical significance between severity and elevated plasma D-dimer levels (p-value=0.001). The mean UAS score before treatment was 21.08 (Table/Fig 8).

Elevated plasma D-dimer levels ranged from 617 ng/mL to 2681 ng/mL, with a mean of 1912.2 ng/mL. The mean for normal plasma D-dimer levels was 237.82 ng/mL. The percentage of patients with elevated D-dimer levels was higher (60%) in patients with angioedema, compared to 35% in patients without angioedema. There was a strong statistical significance (p=0.04) between the presence of angioedema and elevated D-dimer levels (Table/Fig 9).

Thyroid disorder was seen in 12 patients (12%) of the study population. Elevated D-dimer levels were not observed in patients with thyroid disorder. All chronic urticaria patients affected by thyroid disorder had normal D-dimer levels (Table/Fig 10). An adequate response with antihistamines was noted in 92% of patients. Among these patients, 64% had normal D-dimer levels. Inadequate response was observed in 8 patients, and 7 out of 8 (87.5%) had elevated D-dimer levels (Table/Fig 11),(Table/Fig 12).

Discussion

The types of urticaria included in the present study were CSU, CIU, and CSU+CIU, accounting for 92%, 4%, and 4% of the patients, respectively. In a study conducted by Alen Coutinho I et al., (9), CSU accounted for 55.7% of the patients, while CSU associated with CIU accounted for 44.3%. These findings differ from the findings in the current study.

In the present study, elevated plasma levels of D-dimer were observed in 40 (40%) out of 100 patients, which is similar to the findings in a study conducted by Triwongwaranat D et al., (10), in which 48.3% of patients had elevated D-dimer levels. Additionally, a female preponderance was noted in the present study, with females accounting for 60% of the study population and males accounting for 40%. This is in agreement with the findings of an epidemiological study conducted by Vijayabhaskar C and Venkatesan S, (11) in South India, where females constituted 62% of the population. Among the male patients in the present study, elevated D-dimer levels were seen in 20 (50%), while among the female patients, elevated D-dimer levels were seen in 20 (33.3%). However, there was no statistical significance between gender and the elevation of D-dimer levels (p-value=0.96).

The age range of patients in the present study was 18-76 years, which is higher than that of an Egyptian study conducted by Abo Alwafa HO et al., (12), where the age range was 18-52 years. In the present study, the mean age was 30 years, which was similar to an Egyptian study conducted by Farres MN et al., (13), where the mean age of patients was 29.6 years. The number of patients with elevated D-dimer levels was highest in the age range of 26-50 years, accounting for 28 (70%) out of 40 patients. There was a notable statistical significance between the age range and elevated levels of D-dimer, with a p-value of 0.032.

The duration of chronic urticaria in the present study ranged from eight weeks to one year. The majority of patients (44%) presented within a duration of less than three months. However, plasma D-dimer levels were found to be elevated in a high proportion (60%) of patients with a duration of more than one year, with 12 out of 20 patients showing elevated levels. This finding was further supported by a statistically significant association (p=0.00018) between the duration of chronic urticaria and elevated plasma D-dimer levels. These findings could not be corroborated with other studies as data pertaining to plasma D-dimer levels and duration of urticaria is scarce. Further studies are required to determine the relationship between plasma D-dimer levels and the duration of the disease.

The severity of the disease showed remarkable statistical significance with elevated D-dimer levels, as it was elevated in 20 (70%) out of 28 severe cases in the present study. These findings were consistent with multiple previous studies conducted by Triwongwaranat D et al., Abo Alwafa HO et al., Farres MN et al., Dabas G et al., Asero R, In these studies, increased serum levels of D-dimer among patients with chronic urticaria were observed (2),(10),(12),(13),(14),(15).

Angioedema was noted in 20 (20%) patients in the present study, which was lower compared to other studies such as Abo Alwafa HO et al., (12). In the present study, elevated plasma D-dimer levels were observed in 12 (60%) out of 20 patients with angioedema, and this data was found to be statistically significant with a p-value of 0.04. This is in contrast to the study by Abo Alwafa HO et al., where they found no statistical significance (12).

An interesting finding is observed regarding the relationship between elevated plasma D-dimers and response to antihistamines. The proportion of patients with normal plasma D-dimer levels who showed a good response to antihistamines was greater, with 59 (98.3%) out of 60 patients, compared to the percentage of patients with elevated plasma levels, where 33 (82.5%) out of 40 patients responded well. These results are higher than the findings in the study conducted by Kaplan AP and Giménez-Arnau AM et al., where only 45-60% of cases with elevated plasma D-dimer levels were found to respond well to antihistamines (16),(17). This difference may be due to the inclusion of more severe cases in that study.

Seven out of 40 cases (17.5%) showed a lesser response to antihistamines and were considered relatively refractory to treatment. This percentage was significantly lower compared to the findings of the study by Abo Alwafa HO et al., where 35% of cases with elevated D-dimer were non responders to antihistamines (12). Similar findings to the present study were noted in studies conducted by Humphreys F and Hunter JA, and Gattey N et al., (18),(19).

In the present study, a patient with extremely high D-dimer levels was resistant to treatment with antihistamines but was successfully treated with cyclosporine. There are a few studies that emphasise the role of drugs like tranexamic acid and low molecular weight heparin, as well as cyclosporine (20),(21). Several multicentric studies need to be conducted to explore immunological and coagulation defects as a causation for this antihistamine-resistant chronic urticaria. The role of drugs like newer anticoagulants, biologicals, and biosimilars may form the future management armamentarium for chronic urticaria patients. D-dimer levels may be used as a laboratory parameter for determining antihistamine resistance and severity in these patients.

Limitation(s)

The present study had a few limitations. It was conducted in a single tertiary care centre, so the results may not be directly applicable to a larger population. Further studies with a larger sample size can be conducted in the future.

Conclusion

The present study explores the importance of plasma D-dimer levels in cases of chronic urticaria and how these levels vary with factors such as gender and age. It also determines the statistical significance of these factors. The study provides important insights into the relationship between the duration of chronic urticaria and elevated plasma D-dimer levels, establishing a novel finding with statistical significance. Additionally, the study supports already established findings, such as the association between severity and elevated plasma D-dimer levels, as well as the decreased response to antihistamines in cases with elevated D-dimer levels. The role of the interaction between immune response and coagulation factors opens up new avenues for research in the management of antihistamine-resistant chronic urticaria. This includes the potential use of immunomodulators like cyclosporine and anticoagulants like low molecular weight heparin and tranexamic acid. Further studies are required to enhance the authors understanding and treatment of chronic urticaria with elevated D-dimers.

References

1.
Sadowska-Przytocka A, Czarnecka-Operacz M, La? cka K, Jenerowicz D, Adamski Z. The relationship between the severity of clinical symptoms of chronic urticaria and serum D-dimer levels. Advances in Dermatology and Allergology. 2021;38(3):486-89. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Criado PR, Antinori LC, Maruta CW, Reis VM. Evaluation of D-dimer serum levels among patients with chronic urticaria, psoriasis and urticarial vasculitis. An Bras Dermatol. 2013;88(3):355-60. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Sachdeva S, Amin S, Gupta V, Tahseen M. Chronic urticarial. Indian Journal of Dermatology. 2011;56(6):622-28. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Godse K, De A, Zawar V, Shah B, Girdhar M, Rajagopalan M, et al. Consensus statement for the diagnosis and treatment of urticaria: A 2017 update. Indian J Dermatol. 2018;63(1):02-15. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Jaiswal A, Godse K. Evalution of D-Dimer serum levels among patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria and its correlation with disease severity. Gobal Journal for Research Analysis. 2020;9(9):39-41. [crossref]
6.
Korte W, Reisen W. Latex-enhanced immunoturbidometriy allows d-dimer determination in plasma and serum samples. Clin Chem. 2000;46(6 pt 1):871-72. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Zuberbier T, Aberer W, Asero R, Bindslev-Jensen C, Brzoza Z, Canonica GW, et al. The EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO Guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of urticarial. the 2013 revision and update. Allergy. 2014;69(7):868-87. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
De A, Godse K, Dhoot D, Sarda A. Real-life experience of efficacy and safety of bilastine in the refractory cases of chronic spontaneous urticaria and its effect on the quality of life of patients. Indian J Dermatol. 2021;66(2):159-64. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Alen Coutinho I, Regateiro FS, Fernandes RA, Pita JS, Gomes R, Coelho C, et al. Refractory chronic urticaria in adults. Clinical characterization and predictors of severity. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020;16(1):97. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Triwongwaranat D, Kulthanan K, Chularojanamontri L, Pinkaew S. Correlation between plasma D-dimer levels and the severity of patients with chronic urticaria. Asia Pac Allergy. 2013;3(2):100-05. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Vijayabhaskar C, Venkatesan S. Clinico-epidemiological study of chronic urticaria in a government tertiary care centre in South India. Int J Res in Dermatol. 2019;6(1):100. [crossref]
12.
Abo Alwafa HO, Mohammed MF, Mohammed YR. Evaluation of plasma d-dimer level in patients with chronic urticaria. J Dermat Cosmetol. 2019;3(1):07-11.[crossref]
13.
Farres M, Refaat M, Melek N, Ahmed E, Shamseldine M, Arafa N. Activation of coagulation in chronic urticaria in relation to disease severity and activity. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2015;43(2):162-67. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Dabas G, Thakur V, Bishnoi A, Parsad D, Kumar A, Kumaran MS. Causal relationship between D-dimers and disease status in chronic spontaneous urticaria and adjuvant effect of oral tranexamic acid. Acid. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2021;12(5):726-30. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Asero R. D-dimer: A biomarker for antihistamine-resistant chronic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132(4):983-86. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Kaplan AP. Treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2012;4(6):326-31. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Giménez-Arnau AM, Toubi E, Marsland AM, Maurer M. Clinical management of urticaria using omalizumab: The first licensed biological therapy available for chronic spontaneous urticaria. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30(5):25-22. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Humphreys F, Hunter JA. The characteristics of urticaria in 390 patients. Br J Dermatol. 1998;138(4):635-38. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Gattey N, Bahrani B, Hull P. Chronic spontaneous urticaria - the Saskatchewan experience and questionnaire survey. All Asth Clin Immun. 2014;10(Suppl 1)A27. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Curto-Barredo L, Silvestre JF, Giménez-Arnau AM. Update on the treatment of chronic urticaria. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014;105(5):469-82. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Asero R. Plasma D-dimer levels and clinical response to ciclosporin in severe chronic spontaneous urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135(5):1401-03.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/66909.18780

Date of Submission: Aug 09, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Sep 15, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Nov 06, 2023
Date of Publishing: Dec 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 07, 2023
• Manual Googling: sep 20, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Nov 03, 2023 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com